Engagement path
From intake to assurance handoff
A typical ESG Assurance Readiness Review follows four stages. Timings flex with disclosure volume, but the sequence stays the same so finance and compliance know what happens each week.
We designed this path for teams who already have a report draft — or a serious outline — and a booked or imminent assurance window. If you are still choosing frameworks, start with framework mapping before a full readiness review.
The path below assumes a three-to-five-week engagement based in Taipei with optional plant visits.
Intake and engagement letter
Confirm frameworks, reporting period, entity boundary, assurance firm timeline, and languages for the memo. You receive a fixed-fee estimate. Work starts after the letter is signed and the deposit clears.
Document room and gap inventory
We set up a shared room for the report draft, GHG workbooks, prior assurance comments, and source extracts. You get a gap list ranked by assurance risk — missing ownership, stale factors, and narrative claims without evidence.
Working sessions
Two structured sessions with finance and compliance leads (and plant controllers when needed). We rewrite high-risk footnotes, restructure the binder, and draft control narratives for judgment areas such as leased electricity or outsourced logistics.
Readiness memo and handoff
You receive a memo suitable for board or audit committee circulation, plus a binder index the assurance team can navigate. We offer a short handoff call with your assurance provider if you invite them.
Ready to place your reporting cycle on this path?
Browse the full engagement list or send your timeline for an estimate.